• Print
  • Default text size A
  • Larger text size A
  • Largest text size A

Yield curves and yield curve dynamics

  • Wiley Global Finance WILEY GLOBAL FINANCE
  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.

A yield curve is a visual display of current conditions in some particular fixed-income bond market. It’s a snapshot of interest rates in that market—a simple yet often informative graph that plots yields to maturity on the vertical axis and time to maturity on the horizontal axis for a homogeneous set of securities.

A yield curve also is called the term structure of interest rates. Some academics distinguish the two, preserving one for zero-coupon bonds and the other for standard coupon bonds, but we’ll use them as synonyms and specifically identify the type of securities being discussed.

Yield curves are great for the study of bond math. We can move seamlessly, albeit with some assumptions, between the commonly observed yield curve on coupon bonds and related curves that we derive—the implied spot curve and the implied forward curve. These two are hugely important in fixed-income analysis. It’s no doubt an exaggeration, but we think that the implied forward curve is the single most useful line in fixed-income markets—and the implied spot curve is not far behind.

Most yield curves are based on government securities. That’s so that we can hold constant all the factors other than time to maturity that impact investors’ required rates of return—in particular, credit risk, liquidity, and taxation. Obviously, all yields should be stated for the same periodicity. This is a problem in practice at the short-term end of the yield curve (i.e., the money market), but it can be rectified with some basic bond math. Also, the yields to maturity ideally would be for zero-coupon securities so that coupon reinvestment risk is not a factor.

In reality, there is no perfect data set for term structure analysis. Typically seen yield curves are plots of street convention yields on coupon-bearing Treasury notes and bonds instead of yields on Treasury STRIPS. In particular, the yields displayed usually are for on-the-run issues (i.e., the most recently auctioned Treasury securities). These are actively traded and typically are priced close to par value, thereby minimizing the effects of the deferral for tax purposes of the gains and losses from buying at a discount or a premium. The problem is that there are gaps in the times to maturity, so some yields have to be interpolated.

Yield to Maturity and Yield Curve Shape

The yield to maturity of a bond is the fixed yield such that the sum of the discounted cash flows equals the price of the bond. For different maturity bonds, the yields to maturity will be different. Indeed, instead of discounting by a flat yield, each coupon can be discounted with a zero-coupon bond rate that applies to that maturity.

By placing bonds of different maturities on a level playing field, yields can help us see the state of the market at any given time. A simple way to do this is to chart yields of bonds of different maturities with maturity being the x-axis. Exhibit 1 displays such a graph for January 2, 2007, and for April 22, 2010 to show the variation in the shape over time.

The idea behind Exhibit 1 is referred to as the yield curve, which more generally can be thought of as the relationship between yields and time to maturity. Mathematically, the yield curve is the set of yields as a function of time; without using mathematical terms, the yield curve can be thought of as a "machine" that takes time to maturity as an input and outputs the yield for a bond of that maturity. The term "yield curve" can also be a source of confusion since the market uses the term "curve" as the slope of yields between two maturity points, that is, the difference in yields. These curves are referred to using the two points under consideration, such as 2s/10s curve for the difference between the 10-year and 2-year points. Yield curve trades are discussed specifically later in this chapter, but we will continue to use the general term "yield curve" when referring to the entire set of relationships between yields and time.

Exhibit 1: Two Different Yield Curve Shapes.

74_Fig1

Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

Why is the yield curve a useful concept? The yield curve can be thought of as the price of lending (borrowing) money over different points in time. For example, the yield curve in Exhibit 1 on April 22, 2010 has a steep upward slope, which means that investors are willing to lend money at short maturities for very little but will charge a much higher rate to lend money at fixed rates for longer periods of time. Explanations of the shape of the yield curve have tended to be bucketed in three broad categories: term premium, expectations, and segmentation.

One reason for the upward slope for April 22, 2010 could be that investors are more comfortable lending out for shorter maturities, such as six months, but become increasingly risk-averse for longer periods of time, thus demanding higher yields. This extra yield stemming from risk aversion is known as term premium. Although it may be a contributing factor, term premium alone cannot explain the yield curve since, at times, the yield curve can be downward sloping. Instead, there are likely other factors at work, such as market expectations of yields, more formally known as the expectations hypothesis. Simply put, the hypothesis attempts to explain the yield curve as market expectations for interest rates in the future.

Looking back at Exhibit 1, the steep upward slope in the yield curve on April 22, 2010, may indicate that investors are expecting rates to be higher in the future, which would lead to lending money at low rates for short maturities but at higher rates if the money is locked up for longer maturities. This interpretation of the yield curve can be important for judging the state of the economy and understanding how the yield curve itself may react to changing economic conditions, which we discuss in detail later. Finally, the segmentation hypothesis stipulates that certain investor classes prefer to invest in certain maturity ranges, and this segmentation produces the yields we see in the yield curve. Segmentation can be a factor in some parts of the yield curve, such as with pension funds buying longer-end assets to match their long-dated liabilities (e.g., pension payments in the future). However, segmentation is unlikely to be a satisfactory explanation of the yield curve overall—as rates markets have matured, the presence of investors such as hedge funds that are more nimble in their investments and can take advantage of mispricing across the curve makes segmentation unlikely as a major source of yield differences.

In sum, the yield curve is likely a mix of market expectations as well as some risk aversion, while certain niche sectors may feel the effects of segmentation.

  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.
Article copyright 2011 by Michael V. Brandes and Siddhartha Jha.. Reprinted and adapted from Naked Guide to Bonds: What You Need to Know—Stripped Down to the Bare Essentials and Interest Rate Markets: A Practical Approach to Fixed Income, by Siddartha Jha, with permission from John Wiley & Sons. The statements and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. Fidelity Investments® cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data. This reprint and the materials delivered with it should not be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of any funds mentioned in this reprint.
The data and analysis contained herein are provided "as is" and without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Fidelity is not adopting, making a recommendation for or endorsing any trading or investment strategy or particular security. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice, and you should always obtain current information and perform due diligence before trading. Consider that the provider may modify the methods it uses to evaluate investment opportunities from time to time, that model results may not impute or show the compounded adverse effect of transaction costs or management fees or reflect actual investment results, and that investment models are necessarily constructed with the benefit of hindsight. For this and for many other reasons, model results are not a guarantee of future results. The securities mentioned in this document may not be eligible for sale in some states or countries, nor be suitable for all types of investors; their value and the income they produce may fluctuate and/or be adversely affected by exchange rates, interest rates or other factors.

In general, the bond market is volatile, and fixed income securities carry interest rate risk. (As interest rates rise, bond prices usually fall, and vice versa. This effect is usually more pronounced for longer-term securities). Fixed income securities also carry inflation risk, liquidity risk, call risk and credit and default risks for both issuers and counterparties. Lower-quality fixed income securities involve greater risk of default or price changes due to potential changes in the credit quality of the issuer. Foreign investments involve greater risks than U.S. investments, and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, and economic risks. Any fixed-income security sold or redeemed prior to maturity may be subject to loss.

600585.3.0