• Print
  • Default text size A
  • Larger text size A
  • Largest text size A

Can emerging markets stage a turnaround?

The risks in emerging markets may already be priced in, say our investing leaders.

With investor concerns focused on tensions in the Ukraine , a slowing Chinese economy, and broad emerging-market weakness, Fidelity presidents, chief investment officers, and other leaders within the investment divisions at Fidelity gathered to discuss whether these and other risks could spark a global market crisis.

Veteran emerging markets fund manager John Carlson views the recent pullback as “more of an adjustment than a crisis,” but warns that security selection in this environment gets much trickier. “We are entering an ‘age of bifurcation,’ when it will take superior research and analysis to ferret out the winners from the losers.”

Here are excerpts from the far-ranging discussion, moderated by Jacques Perold, President of Fidelity Management & Research Co. [Note: The following views represent those of one or more individuals, and should not be considered as the collective view of either Fidelity Investments or any particular investment division.]

The big picture

Jacques Perold (Moderator): Should investors be concerned about emerging markets?

John Carlson (Emerging-Market Debt): I would characterize what’s currently happening in emerging markets as more of an adjustment than a crisis. Emerging-market sovereigns are generally in much better shape from a balance sheet/cash flow perspective than they were 30 years ago. Since 1982-83, the wind has been at the backs of these countries. By and large, there has been a massive decline in global interest rates, an increase in commodity prices, a significant rise in global trade, and growth in consumer middle-class populations. In addition, there’s been a decline in foreign currency debt (as a percentage of GDP), and a massive rise in foreign exchange reserves (as a percentage of GDP) (see chart below). Today, fewer countries have fixed exchange rates. These developments illustrate how emerging-market countries are more stable now from a sovereign debt standpoint than during previous crises.

Perold: Are you saying investors shouldn't be alarmed?

Carlson (Emerging-Market Debt): I’m not saying there couldn't be individual countries that may experience a debt crisis—there are still some significant geopolitical risks in certain countries, such as Ukraine, Argentina, Venezuela, and Turkey. A debt crisis, can, in fact, be healthy over the long term. But the overall financial health among many emerging markets is more stable than it was in the past, and I think the likelihood of a local debt problem becoming a systemic problem is diminished.

With the growth of the capital markets over the past several decades, there has been a restructuring of bank loans, the issuance of hard currency, and the increased development of local currency instruments. Emerging-market sovereigns are less indebted today and have moved more of their debt into local currency, mainly because of the rise of the consumer middle class—a population that needed investment/savings vehicles, insurance, and mortgages, all of which required the development of local capital markets.

Perold: Are we a long way from the currency mismatch crises that occurred in the 1990s?

Carlson (Emerging-Market Debt): Yes—a crisis is harder to find today among many sovereigns.

Joseph Desantis (Equities): Given the buildup of local debt-market borrowing, I do think it’s possible there could be a local sovereign crisis due to an internal issue, such as credit deterioration due to slower economic growth and efforts to raise rates to combat inflation.

Bill Bower (International Equities): Yes, I think we are a long way off from a crisis, and I would argue that it’s easier to analyze those local crises today via traditional economics (through current account deficits or surpluses). Many sovereigns are in much better financial shape, so the currency mismatch isn’t as bad as it was in the 1990s, when some countries went bankrupt overnight because they had primarily U.S.-dollar-denominated liabilities (e.g., Asian financial crisis, 1997).

Desantis (Equities): I agree. I think you can analyze a potential crisis situation better if it is more localized—and today it is less likely to have that global effect in which other countries are impacted when their access to capital is pulled by foreign and local investors, which is what happened in the 1990s. There can be a clearer delineation of country fundamentals, which can separate, rather than concentrate, all borrowers in one category.

Matt Torrey (Emerging-Market Debt and Equity): One important point John Carlson is alluding to is that the yield curve in many countries is a lot longer than it used to be. Many countries used to only have the ability to issue very short-term debt (e.g., Mexico in 1994). Those issues still exist to some extent in certain countries, but yield curves in many other countries have gotten longer as local investor pools have become larger.

So sovereigns are less indebted in foreign currencies. Locally, sovereigns generally have much longer yield curves, making the previous debt) rollover problem a much less significant issue. For example, today, Mexico can issue a 100-year bond; that shows the country has come a long way from the 1994 crisis.

Perold: What about the significant presidential and parliamentary election calendar in 2014?

Bob von Rekowsky (Emerging-Market Equity): Emerging markets face an array of election challenges in 2014, with the potential for both optimism and disappointment in regard to necessary structural reforms. The first half of the year is particularly significant, with general elections in South Africa (April), parliamentary and presidential elections in Indonesia (April and July, respectively), parliamentary elections in Hungary (April), presidential elections in Colombia (May), and general elections in India (May). In 2014, presidential elections will be held in Turkey (August) and Brazil (October), two countries whose economic management have been the subject of street protests by unhappy constituents. This could be a catalyst for higher emerging-market volatility as the year progresses. That said, our previous studies of elections suggest that markets tend to underperform during the three to six months prior to an election amid policy uncertainty, and recover thereafter—regardless of the political stripe of the winning party.

Generally, among asset classes, stocks are more volatile than bonds or short-term instruments and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. Although the bond market is also volatile, lower-quality debt securities including leveraged loans, generally offer higher yields compared to investment-grade securities, but also involve greater risk of default or price changes. The securities of smaller, less well-known companies can be more volatile than those of larger companies. Foreign markets can be more volatile than U.S. markets due to increased risks of adverse issuer, political, market, or economic developments, all of which are magnified in emerging markets. Sector investments can be more volatile because of their narrow concentration in a specific industry.
Views expressed are based on the information available as of Mar. 21, 2014, and may change based on market and other conditions.
There is no guarantee the trends discussed will continue.
Investment decisions should be based on an individual’s own goals, time horizon, and tolerance for risk.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Investing involves risk, including risk of loss.
Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss.
It is not possible to invest directly in an index. All indices are unmanaged.
Information presented is for informational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice or an offer of any particular security. This information must not be relied upon in making any investment decision. Fidelity cannot be held responsible for any type of loss incurred by applying any of the information presented. Content has been provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or an offer for a particular security or securities. These views should not be relied on as investment advice, and because Fidelity’s investment decisions are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Fidelity product or service. Fidelity does not assume any duty to update any of the information. Fidelity cannot be held responsible for any direct or incidental loss incurred by applying any of the information offered. An individual’s investment decisions should take into account the unique circumstances of the individual investor. Please consult your tax or financial advisor for additional information concerning your specific situation.
All indices are unmanaged, and performance of the indices includes reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted, are not illustrative of any particular investment, and an investment cannot be made in any index.
Lower-quality debt securities generally offer higher yields, but also involve greater risk of default or price changes due to potential changes in the credit quality of the issuer. Any fixed-income security sold or redeemed prior to maturity may be subject to loss. Duration is a measure of a security’s price sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Duration differs from maturity in that it considers a security’s interest payments in addition to the amount of time until the security reaches maturity, and also takes into account certain maturity shortening features (e.g., demand features, interest-rate resets, and call options), when applicable. Securities with longer durations generally tend to be more sensitive to interest-rate changes than securities with shorter durations.
The commodities industry can be significantly affected by commodity prices, world events, import controls, worldwide competition, government regulations, and economic conditions. Neither diversification nor asset allocation ensures a profit or guarantees against a loss.
Standard deviation: a mathematical formula for the average distance from the average; how much variation there is from an average or norm.
1. Source: Fidelity Investments, as of Feb. 28, 2014.

2. Source: Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments, as of Jan. 31, 2014.

3. Source: Bloomberg, Credit Suisse, as of Feb. 2014.

4. Source: “China’s forex reserves reach $3.4tn,” www.ft.com, Apr. 11, 2013.

5. Source: “Russia Surprises With Rate Hike as Ruble Plunges,” www.foxbusiness.com, Mar. 3, 2014.

6. Fidelity Investments, as of Mar. 31, 2014.

7. The European Commission, Countries and Regions: Russia, Nov. 19, 2013.

8. Bloomberg, Fidelity Investments, as of Mar. 21, 2014.
Third-party marks are the property of their respective owners; all other marks are the property of FMR LLC.
Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Member NYSE, SIPC, 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, RI 02917