Estimate Time5 min

3 surprising investing themes to consider now

Key takeaways

  • Investors may be focusing too much on the negative impacts of higher interest rates, and not enough on the positive impacts of improving economic growth.
  • A major rotation into cyclical sectors has already begun and could continue—supporting potential outperformance for such sectors.
  • However, one cyclical sector to be cautious about is energy, where certain trends are sending bearish signals, even in the face of higher energy prices.

US stocks lost ground in the third quarter—giving back a portion of the gains they'd notched in the first half of the year.

The decline was in no small part due to worries over interest rates. More than a year and a half into the Fed's current rate-hiking cycle, many investors are concerned that interest rates might rise higher than previously anticipated, and remain at high levels for longer than previously expected.

My research focuses on analyzing market history to uncover patterns and probabilities that can help inform the current outlook. Often, these historical patterns serve to challenge the prevailing narrative driving the market.

Read the full report

Get Fidelity's complete Q4 2023 Investment Research Update, from the desk of Denise Chisholm, director of quantitative market strategy. Download the full report (PDF)

Recently, my research has suggested that investors may be focusing too much on the negative impacts of higher rates, while ignoring the positive potential impacts of rising economic growth. My research has also been turning up bullish signals on cyclical sectors—but bearish signals on one sector in particular. Here's more on 3 key themes I've been seeing.

Sign up for Fidelity Viewpoints weekly email for our latest insights.

1. US stocks: Overlooked potential for strength

It's no secret that interest rates are on the rise. With the economy showing surprising resilience, the Federal Reserve has signaled it may need to hike rates further, and keep them at high levels for longer, in order to keep reining in inflation. This has many investors worrying about the impacts of high rates on the stock market.

But my analysis suggests these investors may be focusing too much on the negatives from higher rates and overlooking the positives from an improving economy. Higher interest rates are often a function of strong economic growth. On a year-over-year inflation-adjusted basis, US gross domestic product (GDP) expanded at a rate of 2.4% in the second quarter of this year, accelerating from 1.7% in the previous quarter. And better-than-expected job growth and retail sales in the third quarter indicated that strength may have continued.

Historically, the strength of the economy has had a greater influence on stock returns than the direction of interest rates. I looked at 12-month periods when economic growth accelerated and interest rates rose since 1962. (I measured economic growth using inflation-adjusted GDP.) Stocks returned an average of 12% during those strengthening-economy, rising-rate periods. By contrast, during 12-month periods when the economy slowed, stocks advanced just 6% when rates fell and 1% when they rose.

Table shows average 12-month advance in the S&P during periods when rates are rising or falling and during periods when growth is accelerating or decelerating.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Growth measured by real gross domestic product (GDP), the value of US economic output adjusted for inflation. Analysis based on the S&P 500®. Rising or falling rates determined by the change in the yield on the 10-year Treasury note over the previous 12 months. All data gathered and analyzed quarterly January 1962 to June 2023. Sources: Haver Analytics and Fidelity Investments, as of June 30, 2023.

The upshot: For investors, an improving economy has historically been a bigger deal than the direction of interest rates.

2. Cyclical sectors: Riding a rotation

An improving economy could also give a potential boost to cyclical sectors, at least on a relative basis. This group of sectors is generally considered to include communication services, consumer discretionary, energy, financials, industrials, materials, real estate, and technology. Since 1962, cyclical sectors have tended to outperform during periods of above-average GDP growth, regardless of whether interest rates rose or fell. Conversely, during historical periods of weak growth, cyclicals have generally lagged defensive sectors (which include consumer staples, health care, and utilities).

A rotation away from defensives and toward cyclical stocks is already well underway. In the 6 months through July, cyclicals experienced relative outperformance that was in the top 5% of all 6-month periods going back to 1962.

Rotations of this scale are generally only seen during recoveries from recessions—and when they've occurred, they've had staying power. Over the last 60 years, the bigger the rotation into cyclicals, the more likely it was to continue over the next 6 months and the stronger cyclicals' subsequent relative performance, on average.

In historical periods similar to what we've just seen—with cyclical outperformance reaching the top 5% of all 6-month periods—the sectors outperformed the market by nearly 6 percentage points over the following 6 months.

3. Energy: One cyclical sector to approach with caution

While I'm seeing bullish signals for cyclical sectors as a whole, there's one cyclical sector that I'd suggest caution on, and that's energy.

This might come as a surprise given the run-up in oil prices we've seen in the past few months. But I'm concerned about a sharp rise in the energy sector's ratio of capital expenditures (CapEx) to sales. (CapEx is the money a company uses to buy, maintain, and improve assets such as land, buildings, vehicles, and equipment. In the energy sector, CapEx includes much of the costs of producing oil and gas, such as for drilling a well.)

Historically, sharp rises in the ratio of CapEx-to-sales have tended to go hand in hand with underperformance (this has been true historically even when the ratio is rising off low levels, as it recently has been). The dynamics behind the recent increase may also be a bearish signal for the sector. The ratio has risen because both capital expenditures and sales fell, but sales fell more. In historical periods with similar dynamics, the sector went on to underperform the market by an average of 9.4 percentage points over the next 12 months.

In conclusion

To be sure, past performance is never a guarantee of future results. But as the final quarter of 2023 gets underway, I suggest investors remember that trends in interest rates and oil prices are only pieces of the current economic puzzle—not the full picture.

Historically, an accelerating economy tends to benefit the market and cyclical sectors—even in the face of higher interest rates. And while higher oil prices might be (all else equal) a positive for energy, other factors might have more influence on the sector's near-to-intermediate-term performance.

Research stocks, ETFs, or mutual funds

Get our industry-leading investment analysis, and put our research to work.

More to explore

References to specific securities or investment themes are for illustrative purposes only and should not be construed as recommendations or investment advice. This information must not be relied upon in making any investment decision. Fidelity cannot be held responsible for any type of loss incurred by applying any of the information presented. These views must not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent of any Fidelity fund or Fidelity advisor. Investment decisions should be based on an individual's own goals, time horizon, and tolerance for risk. This piece may contain assumptions that are "forward-looking statements," which are based on certain assumptions of future events. Actual events are difficult to predict and may differ from those assumed. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will materialize or that actual returns or results will not be materially different from those described here.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Investing involves risk, including risk of loss.

Views expressed are as of the date indicated, based on the information available at that time, and may change based on market or other conditions. Unless otherwise noted, the opinions provided are those of the speaker or author and not necessarily those of Fidelity Investments or its affiliates. Fidelity does not assume any duty to update any of the information.

Stock markets are volatile and can fluctuate significantly in response to company, industry, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. Investing in stock involves risks, including the loss of principal.

As with all your investments through Fidelity, you must make your own determination whether an investment in any particular security or securities is consistent with your investment objectives, risk tolerance, financial situation, and evaluation of the security. Fidelity is not recommending or endorsing this investment by making it available to its customers.

Because of their narrow focus, sector investments tend to be more volatile than investments that diversify across many sectors and companies.

The S&P 500® Index is a market capitalization-weighted index of 500 common stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation to represent US equity performance.

Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Member NYSE, SIPC, 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, RI 02917