• Print
  • Default text size A
  • Larger text size A
  • Largest text size A

The case for developed markets now

Central bank policies and a China slowdown may make developed markets more appealing.

  • Developed Markets
  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.

In recent years many investors have boosted their exposure to fast-growing emerging markets, but two Fidelity portfolio managers say that recently the developed markets have looked more appealing.

This doesn't mean that emerging markets do not play a key role in a global portfolio, especially over the long term. A recent Fidelity research paper has forecast that emerging economies will account for an ever-greater share of global growth over the next 20 years.1 In the near term, however, Fidelity portfolio managers Ruben Calderon, co-manager of Fidelity Global Balanced Fund (FGBLX), and Jurrien Timmer, co-manager of Fidelity Global Strategies Fund (FDYSX), say conditions may justify more consideration of developed markets. “The macro backdrop is much healthier in the developed world than in the emerging world,” says Calderon. “Developed markets continue to be the locomotive for the world economy.”

Both Calderon and Timmer say that central bank policies around the world, weakness in China, and other factors make developed markets more appealing than their emerging counterparts.

Economic stimulus

Quantitative easing programs throughout developed markets, particularly in the U.S. and Japan, have provided considerable support for financial markets. Central bankers’ willingness to backstop their countries’ economies has reassured investors and corporate managers alike. One measure of U.S. corporate sentiment, the Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI), has increased for six months in a row. Its August reading of 55.7% indicates that the U.S. manufacturing economy continues to expand.2

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke first raised the prospect of “tapering” the Fed’s monetary policy initiatives in May, prompting an increase in market volatility, though the Fed held back from reducing bond purchases at the September meeting. For their part, European policymakers continue to signal that they will take all necessary actions to keep the eurozone together. And, the Bank of Japan announced a major quantitative easing program last April, committing to doubling its monetary base over the next two years. Markets responded positively to the prospect of stronger growth in the world’s third-largest economy. “Whenever a central bank makes a really strong policy move, asset prices tend to respond,” says Timmer.

A slowdown in China

Part of the pro–developed markets argument reflects a tilt away from the emerging world. One reason: China’s slowdown. China’s growth has dominated headlines and investment theses for years, but more recently the country’s economy has cooled markedly—from double-digit annual growth as recently at 2010 to an official estimate of 7.5% in 2013.3 This retraction has undercut the resource-based markets, most of them in the emerging world, that until recently benefited from burgeoning Chinese demand. “China is the engine for emerging markets,” Timmer says. “When China’s economy stops growing as fast, that hurts whoever is exporting to China—including suppliers throughout Asia, Latin America, and elsewhere.”

At the same time, emerging markets from Brazil to the Middle East to Russia to Indonesia face political and social troubles that have depressed their growth prospects. “Many countries in the EM complex are seeing increased social risks that could hamper growth in the short term,” says Calderon. “The spontaneous, sudden, and synchronized upheavals we’ve seen recently in some markets are the price you pay for growth.”

Timmer notes that capital flight has exacerbated the emerging-market slowdown. “Emerging markets are far more volatile than developed markets,” he says. “They move around more and they’re more sensitive to capital flows. While, long term, the case for emerging-market growth is in place, in the short term things look like they could be choppy.”

Opportunities in developed markets

While Timmer and Calderon see the potential for challenges in the near future in emerging markets, they see more potential in developed markets, particularly favoring the following stock markets:

The United States
As of the end of July, both Timmer and Calderon held larger-than-benchmark stakes in U.S. stocks relative to their funds’ diversified global benchmarks, because they believe the country offers relatively stable economic growth and will continue to play a role as a financial safe haven. “The U.S. is currently the most attractive equity market in the world,” Calderon says.

Timmer notes that his U.S. emphasis is the logical result of what he describes as a “China weakness” thesis. “Emphasizing the U.S. relative to emerging markets has been an important trend to spot,” he says.

Japan
Japan has struggled with deflationary pressures and weak economic growth for more than two decades, during which policymakers have seemed powerless to right the economy. The big question following the central bank’s bold recent move: Is Japan finally doing what it takes to jump-start its economy? Calderon thinks so. His fund’s position in Japanese equities as of July 31 was due in part to his assessment that the policymakers in office now have the will and the ability to improve the economy. “Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is having his Reagan moment—he’s trying to revive the economy at a time when I think the country’s sentiment may be low,” he says.

Calderon notes that Abe is fighting some significant headwinds, not least of which are his country’s aging population and low birthrate. But Calderon sees several bright spots, including Abe’s emphasis on higher education. “He’s working on getting more people to enter universities, to increase Japan’s ability to exchange intellectual assets with its partners in the developed world,” Calderon says.

Europe
Europe’s financial crisis has dominated headlines about the continent for at least two years. Concerns about Europe’s financial situation obscure a strong investment case for the region’s stocks, according to Calderon. “Europe’s crisis is a liquidity crisis; it’s not a solvency crisis. That’s a major distinction,” he says. “There will be additional crises and scares in the future. But I don’t think that calls for an underweight to the region, especially when many European companies still have reasonable fundamentals and growth.”

Calderon notes that strong trade relations between Europe and the United States buttress European companies. He points out that over the past five years, U.S. foreign direct investment has created more jobs in Europe than in China. And, as in Japan, positive actions by policymakers have stabilized the European economy. “I think the investment world has gotten Europe wrong until recently,” says Calderon. “Investors minimized the importance of the policymakers, and underestimated their determination to hold the eurozone together.”

An ever-shifting global landscape

The complex dynamics of an interconnected global economy mean that investors must look worldwide for opportunities to capture growth, enhance diversification, and adjust to changing circumstances. Emerging markets, which offer stronger long-term growth prospects than developed markets, play an important role. Even now, Timmer and Calderon are finding opportunities in select emerging markets, despite the headwinds faced by the EM complex as a whole. But, for the time being, investors may want to emphasize the developed world, where the macroeconomic backdrop appears more likely to support healthy stock-market returns.

Learn more

  • Jurrien Timmer is co-manager of Fidelity Global Strategies Fund (FDYSX) and Ruben Calderon is co-manager of Fidelity Global Balanced Fund (FGBLX).
  • Find stocks, ETFs, and mutual funds.
  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.
Before investing, consider the funds’ investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. Contact Fidelity for a prospectus or, if available, a summary prospectus containing this information. Read it carefully.
1. "Secular Outlook for Global Growth: Challenges and Opportunities," Fidelity Investments, June 2013.
2. July 2013 Manufacturing ISM Report On Business,” Institute for Supply Management, August 2013.
3. Worldbank.org.
The information presented above reflects the opinions of Jurrien Timmer and Ruben Calderon, as of September 18, 2013. These opinions do not necessarily represent the views of Fidelity or any other person in the Fidelity organization and are subject to change at any time based on market or other conditions. Fidelity disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Fidelity fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Fidelity fund.
Diversification and asset allocation do not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss.
The Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) is a survey of purchasing managers in a certain economic sector. A PMI over 50 represents expansion of the sector compared to the previous month, while a reading under 50 represents a contraction, and a reading of 50 indicates no change. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) reports U.S. PMIs; Markit compiles non-U.S. PMIs.
Stock markets, especially foreign markets, are volatile and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments.
In general the bond market is volatile, and fixed income securities carry interest rate risk. (As interest rates rise, bond prices usually fall, and vice versa. This effect is usually more pronounced for longer-term securities.) Fixed income securities also carry inflation risk, liquidity risk, call risk, and credit and default risks for both issuers and counterparties. Unlike individual bonds, most bond funds do not have a maturity date, so holding them until maturity to avoid losses caused by price volatility is not possible.
It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
The S&P 500 Index is a market capitalization–weighted index of 500 common stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation to represent U.S. equity performance.
Votes are submitted voluntarily by individuals and reflect their own opinion of the article's helpfulness. A percentage value for helpfulness will display once a sufficient number of votes have been submitted.
Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Member NYSE, SIPC, 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, RI 02917
663390.1.3