• Print
  • Default text size A
  • Larger text size A
  • Largest text size A

Four reasons why earnings could grow

Corporate profitability, overseas revenue, capital allocation, and valuations look good.

  • By Brian Hogan, president, equities; Christopher Bartel, senior vice president, head of global equity research; and Darby Nielson, managing director, quantitative research,
  • Fidelity Viewpoints
  • – 01/17/2014
  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.

Stocks follow earnings—meaning that the direction of stock prices tends to coincide with the trajectory of corporate earnings growth. That’s an overarching investment philosophy in Fidelity’s equity division. And it has generally played out over time. During the past 23 years, the price of the S&P 500® Index, a common measure of large-cap U.S. stock performance,  has been closely correlated to the earnings of the companies in the index.

Since the end of 2008 and the global financial crisis, the S&P 500 Index has rebounded strongly, returning 106% through Sep. 30, 2013, and surpassing prior index level peaks in 1999 and 2007. At this point, the bull market in U.S. equities is now 4.6 years in length, above the 3.5-year average length (median is 2.7 years) of all bull markets since 1928.1

Is it sustainable? 

Some market participants have begun to question whether the current pace of strong earnings growth for U.S. companies during the past few years can continue in 2014 and beyond. Some are concerned that cost cutting—a major contributor to earnings growth in recent years—has run its course amid moderating revenue growth. With the Federal Reserve starting to taper its asset purchases, as well as rising interest rates, others point to potentially higher corporate borrowing costs and a subsequent slowdown in share repurchases. 

Despite some concerns about the sustainability of U.S. corporate earnings growth in the coming quarters, there are some compelling reasons why U.S. companies could maintain a healthy rate of growth over the near-to-intermediate term. Here are four:

1. Reasonable corporate profitability

In the third quarter of 2013, a key indicator of profitability, earnings relative to shareholders’ equity, (the aggregate corporate return on equity) for S&P 500 companies was 14.1%, slightly above the index’s 13.6% long-term average. From 1990 to 2013, the maximum trailing annual ROE for the S&P 500 Index was 18.8%, while the minimum was 4.1%. Based on this measure, profitability for the U.S. equity market looks reasonable relative to history, and there is potential for further upside.

Looking more closely at individual sectors (see chart, right), returns on equity (ROE) in the health care, telecommunication services, consumer staples, energy, utilities, and financial sectors were below their long-term averages during the quarter. Average profitability for information technology, consumer discretionary, industrials, and materials, were above their long-term averages. This suggests that while profitability in some sectors is above average, there is room for higher earnings and returns to shareholders in others. In addition, the ongoing globalization of businesses and their diversified earnings streams could also contribute to further improvement in ROE.

Some market commentators have noted that wages, capital investment, and interest expense for U.S. public companies remain low relative to previous economic recoveries. They cite these low levels as unsustainable and forecast deterioration of operating (profit) margins as the costs move to normalized levels. While it is reasonable to expect some wage inflation and that capital investment will accelerate if the economic recovery continues, we believe an increase in these costs will only happen if underlying demand accelerates, driving higher revenue growth and sustaining overall earnings.

2. Overseas revenue is an increasing contributor to U.S. earnings.

During the past decade, foreign sales have represented more than 40% of total revenues for S&P 500 companies, and the proportion has grown (see chart, right). The growing global diversification of the revenue stream for U.S. companies could continue to provide a positive influence on earnings going forward, for two reasons. First, sales growth in some emerging market sectors continues to be higher than the growth in developed economies, in part due to the burgeoning middle class populations in countries like China and India. Also, if the economic stabilization in Europe and China2 continues, it would provide higher future profit growth.

3. Prudent capital allocation

U.S. companies have been disciplined with their use of capital in recent years, and a continuation of this trend could support future earnings growth. In particular, merger and acquisition activity has been subdued, and overall capital expenditures as a percentage of sales have remained at a moderate level.

Corporate America is also flush with cash, allowing many S&P 500 companies to increase dividend payout ratios or initiate/increase share buyback programs, which reduce the outstanding number of shares and effectively increase earnings per share. During the second quarter of 2013, the dollar-value of share repurchases for S&P 500 companies amounted to $122.8 billion, the highest amount since the third quarter of 2011. In addition, the number of S&P 500 companies engaging in both a dividend and a share buyback during the past 12 months (353, or 71% of index) reached its highest level since 2005.3 Furthermore, despite increased share buyback activity and dividend payouts, corporate cash balances are at elevated levels, providing managements with a cushion with which to further increase capital returns to shareholders.

4. Reasonable valuation

During the post-2008 period, the 106% upward move in stocks (through Sep. 30, 2013) has coincided with a 111% increase in corporate earnings.4 At the same time, U.S. economic conditions have been stable, if unremarkable—the nation’s nominal GDP growth has been 16% since the end of 2008 (see chart, right). Since the 1999 peak in the stock market, the disparity between subsequent stock prices and earnings is far more dramatic. Since Dec. 31, 1999, the S&P 500 Index has returned only 48%, while S&P 500 earnings and GDP have grown 114% and 70%, respectively. The key difference is that in December 1999 the market traded at an elevated valuation level. In December 1999, the equity market’s price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio using trailing earnings was 28.4, implying unsustainably high earnings growth. Comparatively, at the end of 2008, the S&P 500 Index’s aggregate trailing P/E ratio was only 18.2, below the historical average of 19.5.5

Today, the equity market’s valuation is still quite reasonable and somewhat below its long-term average, despite the market’s significant move during the past four-plus years—implying that investors generally expect a moderate level of earnings growth. Multiple compression, which occurs when earnings grow faster than stock prices, is the primary reason why the equity market’s valuation has remained reasonable since the recession and financial crisis in 2008. As stated earlier, since December 2008 the stock market is up 106% while trailing earnings have increased 111%, indicating modest multiple compression based on historical earnings growth.

While the market’s P/E ratio (or multiple) on the surface indicates valuation, it also reflects investors’ expectations of earnings growth. As of Sep. 30, 2013, the P/E ratio of the S&P 500 Index using trailing earnings was 17.6, compared with 18.2 at the end of 2008 and an average of 19.5 since 1995. Note the multiple on trailing earnings has compressed slightly because earnings growth has increased more than the market. The below-average P/E of the equity market today (17.6 on trailing earnings versus the average of 19.5) suggests that investors are anticipating only modest earnings growth in 2014 and beyond, which may bode well for stocks if companies surprise on the upside. Moreover, the equity market’s below-average P/E ratio also reflects uncertainty regarding the economy and a variety of political issues.

Using a simple dividend discount framework, the expected long-term earnings growth rate priced into equity markets remains at a low level following the financial crisis (see chart, right). This valuation level (and implied rate of growth) also suggests that there is potential for further earnings upside and multiple expansion in stocks.

Forecasts for solid earnings

At the end of October, Wall Street analysts expected a 10.98% earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 from 2013 to 2014.6 The view of Fidelity’s equity research analysts also forecasts solid earnings growth in 2014. Although there are some valid concerns about the ability of corporate America’s largest companies to maintain a strong rate of earnings growth over the coming years, our proprietary bottom-up view, combined with the four factors presented in this article, suggests there is also a reasonable possibility that the pace of earnings growth—and the strong performance of the equity markets—could be sustainable.

Learn more

  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.
Brian Hogan, president of the equity division at Fidelity, oversees the portfolio management, research, and trading functions within the equity and high income divisions. Christopher Bartel, senior vice president of global equity research for Fidelity oversees quantitative research and technical research. Darby Nielson, managing director of quantitative research in Fidelity’s equity division, manages a team of analysts conducting quantitative research in alpha generation and portfolio construction to enhance investment decisions impacting Fidelity’s equity strategies.

Before investing, consider the funds' investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. Contact Fidelity for a prospectus or, if available, a summary prospectus containing this information.  Read it carefully.

Views expressed are as of the date indicated, based on the information available at that time, and may change based on market and other conditions. Unless otherwise noted, the opinions provided are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Fidelity Investments or its affiliates. Fidelity does not assume any duty to update any of the information.

Investment decisions should be based on an individual’s own goals, time horizon, and tolerance for risk.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

It is inherently difficult to make accurate dividend growth forecasts, and the outcomes from those forecasts are not guaranteed.

All indices are unmanaged, and performance of the indices includes reinvestment of dividends and interest income, unless otherwise noted. Indices are not illustrative of any particular investment and it is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Diversification/asset allocation does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss.

Keep in mind that investing involves risk. The value of your investment will fluctuate over time and you may gain or lose money.

Stock markets, especially non-U.S. markets, are volatile and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. Foreign securities are subject to interest rate, currency exchange rate, economic, and political risks, all of which are magnified in emerging markets.
1. The average and median lengths refer to the 18 bull markets between 1928 and the current bull market existing as of Sep. 30, 2013. The shortest bull market lasted two months in 1932, and the longest lasted 9.5 years in the 1990s. The current bull market is 56 months in length, having begun on Mar. 9, 2009. Stock performance is represented by the S&P 500 Index via Bloomberg L.P. Source: Fidelity Investments (Asset Allocation Research Team), as of Sep. 30, 2013.
2. Global manufacturing, financial conditions, and bank lending standards all improved in the eurozone in Q3 2013. China experienced economic stabilization in Q3 2013 due in part to government stimulus spending. Source: Fidelity Q4 2013 Quarterly Market Update.
3. Source: FactSet “Buyback Quarterly,” Sep. 23, 2013.
4. Return of 106% based on S&P 500 Index from Dec. 31, 2008, to Sep. 30, 2013. Source: Standard & Poor’s.
5. Historical P/E ratio average for S&P 500 Index from Sep. 30, 1995 to Sep. 30, 2013. Source: Standard & Poor’s, Fidelity Investments, as of Sep. 30, 2013.
6. Source of Wall Street earnings consensus estimate: Standard & Poor’s.
The S&P 500® Index, a market capitalization-weighted index of common stocks, is a registered service mark of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., and has been licensed for use by Fidelity Distributors Corporation.
Third-party marks are the property of their respective owners; all other marks are the property of FMR LLC.
Votes are submitted voluntarily by individuals and reflect their own opinion of the article's helpfulness. A percentage value for helpfulness will display once a sufficient number of votes have been submitted.

Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Member NYSE, SIPC, 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, RI 02917