• Print
  • Default text size A
  • Larger text size A
  • Largest text size A

More improvement: Oct. business cycle update

It's modest, but the global economy is still improving; emerging markets face headwinds.

  • By Dirk Hofschire, CFA, SVP, Asset Allocation Research and Lisa Emsbo-Mattingly, Director of Asset Allocation Research,
  • Fidelity Viewpoints
  • – 10/04/2013
  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.

The U.S. economy remains in mid-cycle expansion amid improvements in employment and manufacturing, a solid corporate sector, and generally benign credit and inflation backdrops.

Globally, expansion in most of the world’s developed economies and stabilization in China have underpinned a trend of slow improvement (see U.S. economic indicators scorecard, below).

The following is a more detailed look at developments in major areas of the economy.

Recent trends in major categories


Global growth continued its trend of modest improvement, with developed economies still showing better cyclical dynamics than emerging markets. Leading indicators in 64% of the world’s 37 largest economies have registered growth over the past six months.1 Global manufacturing has picked up, with August purchasing managers’ indices (PMIs) improving month-over-month in 82% of the world’s major economies.2 Solid readings in the PMI bullwhips (new orders minus inventories) suggest that the manufacturing momentum could continue in many larger economies (see chart, right). Most European countries remain in an early-cycle recovery, helped by further stabilization in financial markets and an increase in manufacturing output. Japan has held steady in a mid-cycle phase, with monetary and fiscal policy bolstering economic activity. Risks of a growth recession in China receded amid a combination of increased monetary support, acceleration in state-led spending on infrastructure and investment, and an apparent policy shift toward stabilizing growth.

Many emerging markets have experienced significant financial pressures since May, when the Federal Reserve (Fed) signaled the possibility of tapering asset purchases in its quantitative easing (QE) program. QE had spurred interest rate declines across developed markets in recent years, encouraging carry trades and driving yield-seeking investors toward emerging-market bonds. With expectations of tapering and higher U.S. Treasury yields, carry trades have unwound since May, and capital outflows from emerging markets caused sharp currency depreciation and higher borrowing costs for many developing economies.

The impact has been most pronounced in emerging-market countries with current account deficits that rely on foreign portfolio flows for financing, including India, Indonesia, Brazil, Turkey, and South Africa. Central banks in many of these countries sought to stabilize their currencies and to contain capital outflows by tightening liquidity, raising interest rates, and selling their foreign exchange reserves. However, while these moves were intended to attract foreign capital, the tighter monetary conditions may create additional drag on economic growth. As weaker currencies have spurred inflationary pressures—exacerbated by rising oil prices in oil-importing nations such as India—stagflationary conditions have set in.

Although the Fed’s decision to maintain QE asset-purchase levels has alleviated some of the pressures on emerging-market economies, the risks of lower growth, rising inflation, and higher borrowing costs hold emerging markets in a late-cycle phase. Having failed to implement structural reforms in an environment of ample foreign financing, these economies face significant cyclical challenges. The global economy continues to gain traction, with steady improvement in developed economies and stabilization in China, but emerging markets still face an array of headwinds.

Credit markets and banking

Credit and banking conditions in the U.S. are generally benign. Market volatility has subsided after spiking in June following the Fed’s warning that it might begin to taper QE as early as this year, and the September announcement postponing tapering was greeted warmly by financial markets. Historically low interest rates continued to strengthen personal and corporate balance sheets, as indicated by further declines in bank-loan delinquency rates.3 Although high-yield bond issuance has slowed, investment-grade issuers continued to borrow despite higher rates, as highlighted by the record $49 billion Verizon issue. Credit conditions continue to support economic expansion, though uncertainty over the Fed’s tapering outlook is likely to persist as a potential source of volatility.


The U.S. labor market maintains its slow rate of recovery. The pace of job creation remained modest over the summer months, with private payroll growth slower than expected in August, reported gains for the prior two months revised downward, and unemployment dropping to a new cyclical low of 7.3%.4 The Beveridge curve, which tracks the relationship between unemployment and job openings, suggests slow, ongoing healing in the labor market following the financial crisis. In the early stages of the recovery, structural problems such as limited labor mobility and skill mismatches led to different vacancy rates than the curve would suggest; recent data show that openings are remaining high while unemployment declines (see chart, right). Leading indicators continue to represent labor market improvement: initial unemployment claims have been gradually falling for much of 2013, and the four-week moving average dropped to new post-recession lows in mid-September.5 The National Federation of Independent Business survey reported a dramatic increase in the percentage of firms planning to increase employment, to the highest level since January 2007. Workers’ quit rates continued to trend higher, suggesting a growing confidence in job prospects.6 Labor markets continue along a path of gradual repair.


Consumer spending growth remained steady despite experiencing a slight deceleration over the course of the year. August core retail sales (excluding autos, gasoline, and building supplies) exhibited an unimpressive 0.2% growth month-over-month, though longer-term growth, at 3.2% year-over-year, is still relatively encouraging.7 Sales of autos, housing, and household durables have increased rapidly, a trend that may be partially attributed to consumers pulling forward large purchases in expectation of rising interest rates. The University of Michigan Survey of Consumer Confidence index declined to a five-month low, with participants citing higher rate expectations and a less optimistic employment outlook. Despite this recent weakening, consumer confidence remains near the upper end of the post-recession range. Overall, consumption remains modestly positive, but could be pressured by concerns over rising interest rates, low income growth, and continued fiscal tightening.


The U.S. housing sector continued to improve, though the pace of recovery has decelerated. Home prices have steadily appreciated, rising 12% over the past year as of June, though the rapidity of increase may be peaking.8 Housing affordability, though still high relative to history, has continued to drop as mortgage rates climb and home prices rise.9 Mortgage loan applications for purchase have weakened by 13% since the beginning of June, as higher rates may keep prospective applicants on the sidelines and put downward pressure on the sector.10 Nevertheless, housing activity remains solid as housing starts and permits continue to grow at double-digit rates.11 The housing supply remains relatively tight, with the inventory of new and existing homes standing at 5.1 months, which is below the average since 1995.12 According to recent survey data released by the National Association of Home Builders, demand has held firm and may grow further as rising employment provides a boost to new household formation. The rise in mortgage rates and home prices has slowed, and the overall housing recovery remains in a fundamentally sustainable upward trend.


Corporate profitability has been high and continues to grow (but at a slower rate, which is typical of this stage of the business cycle), and the U.S. corporate sector remains solid. According to a recent Duke University/CFO magazine corporate survey, CFOs continue to feel more optimistic about their own companies and the economy overall. Echoing those results, the Small Business Optimism Index in August remained near cyclical highs.13 New orders for core capital goods were weaker than expected in July, though the trend in capital expenditures remains supportive, up 7.4% from a year ago.14 The manufacturing sector remains in expansion, with the PMI hitting a robust 55.7 in August. Although seasonal statistical adjustments may have contributed, the improvement appears broad-based, with 83% of industries reporting growth and manufacturers citing healthy production figures and increased new orders.15 A strengthening manufacturing sector and buoyant sentiment continue to support a solid corporate sector.


Inflation remains well anchored, posting levels below the Fed’s target rate of 2.0%. The headline consumer price index (CPI) fell from 2.0% in July to 1.5% in August, mainly due to a year-over-year decline in gasoline prices.16 Supported primarily by higher home prices, August’s Core CPI (which excludes volatile energy and food prices) rose modestly for the second month in a row, reaching 1.8% on a year-over-year basis.17 Despite continued expansion in the labor market, wage growth has not contributed meaningfully to inflation. Inflation remains stable overall, as improvements in the labor market have not been strong enough to induce the wage growth that might kindle inflation pressures.

Summary and outlook

The global business cycle continues to indicate a steady upward trend despite the relatively slow pace of overall growth. Most of the world’s developed economies—including Europe, the U.S., and Japan—remain in the more favorable early or mid-cycle phases. Despite late-cycle dynamics, China’s outlook has stabilized as authorities have eased policies. The Federal Reserve’s surprise decision to postpone the tapering of its QE program helped arrest the upward movement in bond yields, which could reduce pressure on emerging markets beleaguered by foreign capital outflows. The prospect of a settling period for global interest rates amid positive economic momentum provides an overall benign investment climate.

Nevertheless, a number of risks persist, and the global cyclical upside appears limited. The Fed’s decision not to pull back on its QE program was an acknowledgement that the U.S. economy continues to grow slowly. Despite improvement in developed economies, the recovery in Europe overall remains tepid, and the sustainability of Japan’s expansion likely depends on implementing difficult structural reforms alongside the present monetary and fiscal easing. China’s growth outlook is hampered by weak corporate profitability, excessive credit creation, and overcapacity in sectors related to real estate. Other large emerging economies such as India and Brazil face the need to implement structural reforms to reignite from their stagflationary conditions. Oil prices could spike further amid supply and geopolitical risks (see below), monetary policy uncertainty persists across multiple regions, and the U.S. faces fiscal deadlines over the next month that could provoke political brinkmanship and negative headlines.

Because these risks occur within the context of an improving global business cycle, this environment continues to favor allocation to more economically sensitive assets, such as equities. European stocks in particular may stand to benefit from an early-cycle dynamic and discounted valuations. Despite the likely upward pressure on interest rates over time, a potential respite from the recent increase in global yields may benefit bonds.

Upside risks to oil prices may be underappreciated

Recent events in Syria have overshadowed a significant drop in oil supply from many nations in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). Outages in Nigeria, Iran, Iraq, and most recently Libya have reduced production by nearly 1.5 million barrels per day (bpd) over the past year.18 Libya alone accounts for more than two-thirds of the decrease, as civil conflict has driven production back toward the low levels seen during the overthrow of Gaddafi (see chart, below left). In response, Saudi Arabia has boosted its output by close to one million bpd, and is now producing at its fastest pace in 30 years (see chart, below right). By our estimates, effective OPEC spare capacity is at its lowest level since 2004, when Brent prices rose almost 70% in just 10 months.19

Amid tightening fundamentals, rising geopolitical risk has helped to drive Brent crude from its trading range of $100 to $105 to a peak of almost $117 in August, settling at around $110 recently.20 The decreased likelihood of a U.S. attack on Syria removed upward pressure on the oil market in the near term. However, renewed geopolitical tensions in various OPEC member nations are beginning to emerge. For example, in Algeria—a country that produces more than one million bpd—recent government attempts to consolidate power ahead of April elections risk reigniting political protests and disrupting supply. During previous periods of heightened geopolitical tensions in the region (e.g., Egyptian unrest and Libyan civil wars in 2011 and the sanctions of Iran in 2012), the risk premium pushed average Brent prices 30% higher than the level justified by supply-and-demand fundamentals.21

The rapid tightening of fundamentals supports the recent rise in Brent prices, but brewing geopolitical concerns imply upside risk to the price of oil. Although retail gasoline prices have lagged Brent prices due to seasonal changes in regulatory standards, a $10 increase in Brent prices in general approximates a 0.5% additional tax on the disposable income of U.S. consumers. Higher oil prices often lead to a short-term spike in inflation, and a shift in consumer spending from discretionary goods to energy tends to result in slower economic growth.22

Learn more

  • Review your current portfolio, get analysis on U.S. stocks, bond, and sectors, and independent perspectives from Morningstar and Starmine with Fidelity Guided Portfolio SummarySM (login required).
  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.
The Asset Allocation Research Team (AART) conducts economic, fundamental, and quantitative research to develop asset allocation recommendations for Fidelity’s portfolio managers and investment teams. AART is responsible for analyzing and synthesizing investment perspectives across Fidelity’s asset management unit to generate insights on macroeconomic and financial market trends and their implications for asset allocation. Asset Allocation Research Analysts Craig Blackwell, CFA; Austin Litvak; and Kathryn Carlson also contributed to this article. Vic Tulli, vice president, senior investment writer, provided editorial direction.
Views expressed are as of the date indicated, based on the information available at that time, and may change based on market and other conditions. Unless otherwise noted, the opinions provided are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Fidelity Investments or its affiliates. Fidelity does not assume any duty to update any of the information.
Generally, among asset classes, stocks are more volatile than bonds or short-term instruments and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. Although the bond market is also volatile, lower-quality debt securities including leveraged loans generally offer higher yields compared to investment grade securities, but also involve greater risk of default or price changes. Foreign markets can be more volatile than U.S. markets due to increased risks of adverse issuer, political, market, or economic developments, all of which are magnified in emerging markets.
Investment decisions should be based on an individual’s own goals, time horizon, and tolerance for risk.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
All indices are unmanaged. You cannot invest directly in an index.
The Typical Business Cycle depicts the general pattern of economic cycles throughout history, though each cycle is different; specific commentary on the current stage is provided in the summary and outlook on page 4. In general, the typical business cycle demonstrates the following:
• During the typical early-cycle phase, the economy bottoms out and picks up steam until it exits recession, then begins the recovery as activity accelerates. Inflationary pressures are typically low, monetary policy is accommodative, and the yield curve is steep. Economically sensitive asset classes such as stocks tend to experience their best performance of the cycle.
• During the typical mid-cycle phase, the economy exits recovery and enters into expansion, characterized by broader and more self-sustaining economic momentum but a more moderate pace of growth. Inflationary pressures typically begin to rise, monetary policy becomes tighter, and the yield curve experiences some flattening. Economically sensitive asset classes tend to continue benefiting from a growing economy, but their relative advantage narrows.
• During the typical late-cycle phase, the economic expansion matures, inflationary pressures continue to rise, and the yield curve may eventually become flat or inverted. Eventually, the economy contracts and enters recession, with monetary policy shifting from tightening to easing. Less economically sensitive asset categories tend to hold up better, particularly right before and upon entering recession.


Please note that there is no uniformity of time among phases, nor is there always a chronological progression in this order. For example, business cycles have varied between two and 10 years in the U.S., and there have been examples when the economy has skipped a phase or retraced an earlier one.

1. The 37 largest economies include: Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United States, United Kingdom. Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Foundation for International Business and Economic Research, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Aug. 31, 2013.
2. Source: Markit, Institute for Supply Management, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Jul. 31, 2013.
3. Source: Federal Reserve Board, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) through August 31, 2013.
4. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Jul. 31, 2013.
5. Source: Department of Labor, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Sep. 14, 2013.
6. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Jul. 31, 2013.
7. Source: Census Bureau, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Aug. 31, 2013.
8. Prices as presented by the S&P/Case-Shiller 20-City Composite Home Price Index. Source: Standard & Poor’s, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Jun. 30, 2013.
9. Source: National Association of Realtors, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Jul. 31, 2013.
10. Source: Mortgage Bankers Association, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Sep. 13, 2013.
11. Source: Census Bureau, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Aug. 31, 2013.
12. Source: Census Bureau, National Association of Realtors, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Jul. 31, 2013.
13. Source: National Federation of Independent Business, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Aug. 31, 2013.
14. Source: Census Bureau, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Jul. 31, 2013.
15. Source: Census Bureau, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Jul. 31, 2013.
16. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Aug. 31, 2013.
17. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Aug. 31, 2013.
18. Source: International Energy Agency, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Aug. 31, 2013.
19. Effective OPEC capacity is the sum of the estimated readily available capacity of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates, which are the only OPEC countries that have restrained available production in the past. Source: International Energy Agency, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Aug. 31, 2013.
20. Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P., Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Sep. 18, 2013.
21. Figures based on a proprietary Fidelity Investments model created using macroeconomic and fundamental data. Source: Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Sep. 15, 2013.
22. Proprietary Fidelity Investments analysis based on data provided by The Wall Street Journal, the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Source: The Wall Street Journal, Energy Information Administration, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments (AART) as of Aug. 31, 2013.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is a monthly inflationary indicator that measures the change in the cost of a fixed basket of products and services, including housing, electricity, food, and transportation.
A Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI ) is a survey of purchasing managers in a certain economic sector. A PMI over 50 represents expansion of the sector compared to the previous month, while a reading under 50 represents a contraction, and a reading of 50 indicates no change. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) reports U.S. PMI s.
The S&P/Case-Shiller® Home Price Indices measure the average change in home prices in a particular geographic market and are designed to be a reliable and consistent benchmark of U.S. housing prices. The S&P/ Case-Shiller 20-City Composite Home Price Index measures the value of residential real estate in 20 U.S. metropolitan areas.
Fidelity Guided Portfolio SummarySM (Fidelity GPSSM) is an enhanced analytical capability provided for educational purposes only.
Votes are submitted voluntarily by individuals and reflect their own opinion of the article's helpfulness. A percentage value for helpfulness will display once a sufficient number of votes have been submitted.
Third-party marks are the property of their respective owners; all other marks are the property of FMR LLC.
Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Member NYSE, SIPC, 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, RI 02917