• Print
  • Default text size A
  • Larger text size A
  • Largest text size A

State of the sector: utilities

Electric utility companies have produced historically strong earnings growth.

  • Domestic Stocks
  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.

Corporate earnings, a key fundamental driver of stock performance, continued to trend favorably in the utilities sector during the past six months. Year-over-year earnings per share (EPS) growth was strong on an absolute basis in the first quarter of 2013, following robust growth in the fourth quarter of 2012.

However, the first quarter results came in slightly below Wall Street analyst expectations (see "Corporate earnings" chart below right). More specifically, government-regulated electric utilities generally posted earnings growth at a pace of roughly 5% on a year-over-year basis, but those collective results were slightly shy of expectations due largely to weaker-than-expected overall power demand, particularly from the industrial segment of the U.S. economy.1 The lack of industrial power demand—often seen as an artery to the economy—suggests that there has yet to be material improvement in domestic economic output.

Weaker-than-expected power demand

Big yields in utilities

Discover which high-yielding utility stocks you should consider focusing on.
Read the article

During the past year, domestic power demand was up only 0.05% (through April 2013), according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Going into 2013, the leaders of many utilities were anticipating a 1% average rate of year-over-year sales growth in power. As first-quarter earnings results were reported, most companies revised their sales growth estimates lower for the remainder of 2013.

For example, the primary utilities operating in the states of Virginia and Florida lowered their sales growth guidance to 1.0% and 0.7%, respectively, from 2.0% and 1.7%, respectively, at the start of 2013.2 Generally speaking, overall electric power demand growth is now estimated within a range of 0% to 0.5% for the remainder of 2013.3

Return to more typical winter temperatures provided a boost to earnings growth

Many companies that managed to exceed analysts' earnings expectations during the past six months were those that benefited from the return to more seasonable winter weather.

Typical weather temperatures in many U.S. regions during the winter season of 2012–2013, in addition to below-average temperatures in March 2013, provided a favorable backdrop for earnings growth in the sector. Colder temperatures require greater use of power for heating and other needs. This seasonally cold weather, in contrast to unusually warmer weather that existed during the 2011–2012 winter months, was particularly helpful in year-over-year earnings comparisons.

Rising natural gas prices aid deregulated electric utilities

The earnings of deregulated utilities, which are more influenced by commodity price movements, by and large were supported by the rising price of natural gas—a key input to power generation.

Historically, natural gas and power prices have tended to be highly correlated. So far in 2013, the price of natural gas has increased 19%, to $3.91 per million British thermal units (Btu's), and had moved over $4.00 per million Btu's in late April.4 Unlike regulated utilities, whose ability to adjust power prices is controlled by government entities, deregulated utilities have the ability to pass along higher input costs to customers in the form of higher power prices. Given this pass-though ability, higher natural gas prices tend to have a positive influence on corporate earnings for deregulated utilities.

Generally speaking, deregulated utilities expect this upward trend in the price of natural gas to continue, and several took steps to slow down their hedging activity of the commodity to benefit from higher anticipated future prices.

Cost management efforts

Cost control remains a major focus in the utilities sector. Many companies have continued to keep their operating and maintenance costs down in the face of weaker-than-expected topline power growth trends. Such efforts have also contributed to favorable year-over-year EPS growth during the past six months.

Assessing equity valuations

The combination of low interest rates, a slowly improving U.S. economy, and increased demand from yield-seeking investors has driven many utility stocks to above average valuations. The average price-to-earnings ratio (P/E based on forward earnings estimates) of utility stocks in the S&P 500 Index was 15.9 as of May 10, 2013, above the group’s long-term average P/E of 13.4 (see "S&P 500 Utilities P/E Ratio" chart right).

The last time the sector’s P/E hit this level was in 2006-2007, when rising natural gas prices drove up the cost of power. Utility stocks' P/E multiples also reached this level in 2000, when there was a secular peak in power supply and California was experiencing power shortages and rolling electricity blackouts.

Today, the primary reason why utility stocks are expensive on a P/E basis is strong demand from income-seeking investors in an environment of extremely low bond yields. On a yield basis, the utilities sector looks cheap relative to U.S. Treasury bonds. As of May 10, 2013, the yield on a 10-year U.S. Treasury bond was 1.9%, compared to an average dividend yield in the utilities sector of 3.8%.5

Relative to investment-grade corporate bonds, utility stocks also look attractive (see "Sector dividend yield" chart right). The 3.8% average yield on utility stocks stood above the 3.3% average yield for corporate bonds. For the majority of the past 25 years, utility stocks have not yielded more than corporate bonds.6 Historically, the average dividend yield of the utilities sector has been roughly 25% lower than the average yield offered by BBB-rated U.S. corporate bonds.7

Given their relatively more attractive yields, many income-seeking investors may have allocated a greater portion of their portfolios to utility stocks. For example, investors nearing or in retirement may have been willing to devote a greater portion of their portfolio to utility stocks, given their relatively attractive yields and the additional potential for capital appreciation in one of the historically less volatile sectors of the equity market. In addition, tax rates applied to dividend yields on utilities may also be more advantageous to some investors, as the income from bonds is generally treated as ordinary income and taxed at a higher rate.

In the near term, I do not expect the strong demand for utilities to abate, provided there are not any dramatic shifts in the trajectory of the U.S. economy or monetary policy (e.g., quantitative easing8 or interest rates) from the Federal Reserve. In fact, I would not be overly surprised if P/E multiples in the sector moved even higher in the near term as more yield-seeking investors allocated more capital to utility stocks. It is possible that there is a secular shift in demand for utilities and other high-dividend-paying equities based largely on the maturing of the baby boom generation and shifting investor preferences.

Outlook for utilities stocks over the next six months

Elevated valuations and weaker-than-expected power demand are two potential headwinds for the earnings and stock performance of utilities companies. However, while traditional P/E valuation suggests utility stocks may be expensive, investors should keep in mind that the increased demand for this sector could be a secular trend and continue for some time, provided the current backdrop of low interest rates, accommodative Fed policy, slow economic growth continues, and other potential factors. As more members of the baby boom generation enter retirement, the attributes of utility stocks may come increasingly into play: dividend income and capital appreciation from a conservative business that tends to be less economically sensitive than other sectors.

Further, given the current market backdrop and the prevailing risks to the sector, investors may be well served by focusing on the utilities that are best positioned to grow dividends at above-average rates. As our analysis shows, utilities that have generated the highest dividend growth over time have tended to be the top performers in the sector. Among the areas most likely to experience better-than-average dividend growth are utilities that focus on transmission and natural gas infrastructure development.

Learn more

  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.
Before investing, consider the funds' investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. Contact Fidelity for a prospectus or, if available, a summary prospectus containing this information. Read it carefully.
Views expressed are as of the date indicated, based on the information available at that time, and may change based on market and other conditions. Unless otherwise noted, the opinions provided are those of the author and not necessarily those of Fidelity Investments or its affiliates. Fidelity does not assume any duty to update any of the information.
Investment decisions should be based on an individual’s own goals, time horizon, and tolerance for risk.
Because of their narrow focus, investments in a single sector tend to be more volatile than investments that diversify across many sectors and companies.
Indexes are unmanaged. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
1. Source: Company reports and Fidelity Investments, as of May 10, 2013.
2. See footnote No. 1.
3. See footnote No. 1.
4. Year-to-date natural gas price through May 10, 2013. Source: Bloomberg as of May 10, 2013.
5. Source: Bloomberg, Haver Analytics, Fidelity Investments as of May 10, 2013.
6. Source: FactSet, as of May 10, 2013.
7. A BBB-rating is used by credit-rating agencies Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings to designate debt that is considered lower tier, investment grade quality.
8. Quantitative easing (QE): Unconventional monetary policy used by central banks to stimulate the economy. Typically involves the purchase of financial assets from commercial banks or private institutions, which increases the monetary base.
The S&P 500® Index, a market-capitalization-weighted index of common stocks, is a registered service mark of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., and has been licensed for use by Fidelity Distributors Corporation. The S&P 500® Utilities Index comprises those companies included in the S&P 500 that are classified as members of the GICS® utilities sector. The Bank of America (BofA) Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate/Non-Financial Corporate BBB-rated Index, a subset of the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate Master Index, tracks the performance of U.S.-dollardenominated investment-grade-rated corporate debt publically issued in the U.S. domestic market. This subset includes all securities with a given investment-grade rating of BBB.
Votes are submitted voluntarily by individuals and reflect their own opinion of the article's helpfulness. A percentage value for helpfulness will display once a sufficient number of votes have been submitted.
Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Member NYSE, SIPC, 900 Salem Street Smithfield, RI 02917
647586.4.0