• Print
  • Default text size A
  • Larger text size A
  • Largest text size A

How to find low-volatility income stocks

A company's payout ratio can help target lower-volatility stocks with growth potential.

  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.

For investors seeking an income alternative to the low yields offered by bonds and CDs, dividend stocks may be an answer. In exchange for higher yields, equity investing has historically meant more risk than bond investing, but there may be ways to manage that risk, including careful inspection of the dividend payout ratio—the percentage of earnings a company pays out in shareholder dividends. This data point may be able to help identify stocks with lower prospective volatility than that of the market, competitive income levels to bonds, and strong dividend growth potential.

"We have found that there’s a sweet spot for payout ratios," says Matt Fruhan, manager of the Fidelity® Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) and co-author of a recent report on dividend payout ratios. "High-quality companies with a payout ratio in the 40% to 60% range tend to have higher valuations, lower volatility, and lower cost of capital than the rest of the market. We’re looking for companies that can move into the payout ratio sweet spot over the coming years and receive the potential benefits associated with it."

The case for payout ratio

Looking at a high-quality subset of the S&P 500® Index, consisting of 298 companies with a history of stable, positive earnings1—the kind of business solidity required to increase dividends consistently over time—the study found that firms with a payout ratio from 40% to 60% had several advantages over their peers:

Higher stock values. Companies with higher payout ratios generally traded at higher price-to-earnings (P/E) multiples than companies with lower payout ratios. Companies that increased their payout ratios during the period under review received an increase in their multiples, even as P/Es shrank on the rest of the market.

The premium multiples on high-payout stocks stem in part from the market’s current hunger for yield—hence the elevated P/E on stocks with the highest ratios. "Bonds are expensive, and so are stocks with bond-like characteristics, including many utilities," notes Fruhan. "These stocks aren't very attractive to me. They offer high yields, but there’s little room for them to increase their payout ratios. We want to find companies that haven't implemented a higher payout strategy yet, but have business models that could support higher payouts—and might get a lift in their valuation if they do so," he adds.

Less volatility. Beta describes a stock’s volatility relative to the market as a whole. The Fidelity research showed that companies with a payout ratio from 40% to 80% had betas almost 30% lower than the overall market, likely because these companies have exceptionally stable businesses. But there also seems to be a cause-and-effect relationship between increases in payout ratios and declines in volatility: Companies that increased their payout ratio into this sweet spot saw their stocks’ beta decline significantly, while the beta on the rest of the high-quality universe rose—meaning investors found less volatility in stocks with increasing dividends, even as the rest of the dividend stock market experienced more exaggerated ups and downs.

A competitive advantage. Companies with a payout ratio from 40% to 60% had the lowest cost of debt, as measured by spreads on their bonds' credit-default swaps (CDS), according to the study.

"You might expect bondholders to prefer companies that hoard their capital and keep it available to service debt," says Fruhan. "But debt costs actually went down when companies increased their payout ratios to between 40% and 60%. We think the bond market interprets a payout ratio in this range as an indication of good capital allocation."

The combination of low debt costs and low beta gives these companies a structural, long-term advantage over competitors through a lower overall cost of capital. With this lower cost of capital, companies may be able to pursue reinvestment in their business or opportunistic acquisitions at better terms than their competitors can.

Putting it all together

Reviewing each of these three factors reveals that there is a sweet spot in the payout ratio from 40% to 60%, where multiple benefits are maximized. In this range, investors can capture higher P/E multiples, lower volatility, and lower cost of debt than the market as a whole.

"There’s a strong investment case for looking at companies that are not yet in this payout ratio sweet spot," says Fruhan. "We're especially interested in companies that have demonstrated an appetite to return capital to shareholders through payouts, but haven’t optimized their ratio yet. When they do optimize it, their valuations are likely to increase along with their dividends—a double whammy for shareholders—at the same time their cost of capital declines."

How to use the payout ratio

There's no shortage of candidates that might move into the sweet spot: Some 65% of the companies in the high-quality subset of the S&P 500 Index have a payout ratio lower than 40%.

Fruhan and Naveed Rahman, institutional portfolio manager, believe many companies are likely to increase their ratio in the years ahead. From 1980 to 1999, the S&P 500 as a whole had a median payout ratio of 45%; last year it was much lower—ending the year at 32%. That could suggest room to move up. Meanwhile, companies have extremely healthy balance sheets, with low debt and historically high cash positions. "Corporations are awash in cash, profit margins are at an all-time high, and companies are starting to think about returning money to shareholders," says Fruhan.

One caveat: When using payout ratio, it's essential to focus on the future. "This is not an exercise in looking at yesterday's or today’s dividend payers," says Rahman. "One of the risks is that you fixate on companies that increased their payout ratio in 2011 or 2012, rather than on those that can flex their capital allocation going forward."

Caveat number two: Consider interest rate risk. "If interest rates rise, some of the high-P/E, high-payout ratio, bond-like equities could see their valuations fall," warns Fruhan. "So I try to find companies with earnings that are insulated from a rising-rate environment, or that can even benefit from it."

Companies that fit the profile

Certain types of firms are especially likely to fit the mold. Fruhan observes that distribution companies often benefit from inflation, which is likely to accompany any rise in interest rates. Service companies tend to generate recurring revenue, which provides the stable cash flow needed to sustain an increased payout ratio. Many software and media companies have the requisite combination of reliable revenues and low capital needs.

Fruhan currently is bullish on financials, many of which are likely to benefit from higher interest rates. He notes that regulators depressed many financial companies' payout ratios following the financial crisis, but are beginning to allow greater payouts. "Now balance sheets, capital ratios, and liquidity ratios are much healthier," he says. "The potential systemic risk has gone down dramatically. And you have regulators monitoring the health of the businesses and allowing them to return more capital. So as financial companies' earnings grow from the current extremely challenging environment, you’ll see payout ratios start to climb to 30% or 35%."

"There are plenty of companies at attractive valuations to choose from that have a 20% to 35% payout ratio, current dividend yields from 2% to 3%, and earnings growth in the high single or low double digits," continues Fruhan. "Investors have many opportunities to benefit as firms move into the payout ratio sweet spot."

Learn more

  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.
Before investing, consider the funds' investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. Contact Fidelity for a prospectus or, if available, a summary prospectus containing this information. Read it carefully.
The views and opinions expressed by the speakers are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Fidelity Investments or its affiliates. Any such views are subject to change at any time based on market or other conditions, and Fidelity disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views should not be relied on as investment advice, and, because investment decisions are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Fidelity product. Neither Fidelity nor the outside speakers can be held responsible for any direct or incidental loss incurred by applying any of the information offered. Please consult your tax or financial adviser for additional information concerning your specific situation.
1 The high-quality subset of the U.S. equity market was defined as any constituent of the S&P 500 Index from January 2004 to November 2012 that (1) had no negative calendar-year earnings per share (EPS) over the 2004–2011 period and (2) was in the bottom 50th percentile of EPS volatility based on the coefficient of variation, a normalized measure of dispersion calculated as the ratio of standard deviation to the mean using annual observations over the 2004–2011 period.
Past performance, dividend rates, and payout ratios are historical and do not guarantee future results.
It is inherently difficult to make accurate dividend growth forecasts and the outcomes from those forecasts are not guaranteed.
Beta is a measure of a stock’s risk relative to the market, as represented by a benchmark index that has a beta of 1. This analysis uses predicted beta, a forecast of a stock’s sensitivity to the market based on fundamen¬tal risk factors sourced from the Barra risk model; a beta of more (or less) than 1 indicates that a stock is expected to be more (or less) volatile than the benchmark index. A credit default swap (CDS) is a derivative contract designed to transfer credit exposure from the seller to the buyer, for which the buyer is paid a premium—or spread—over the life of the contract; the larger the spread, the greater the likelihood of default by the issuer.
Stock markets are volatile and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments.
The S&P 500 and S&P are registered service marks of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., and are licensed for use by Fidelity Distributors Corporation and its affiliates. The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged market capitalization–weighted index of common stocks.
It is not possible to invest directly in an index. All indexes are unmanaged.
Votes are submitted voluntarily by individuals and reflect their own opinion of the article's helpfulness. A % value for helpfulness will display once a sufficient number of votes have been submitted.
Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Member NYSE, SIPC, 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, RI 02917