• Print
  • Default text size A
  • Larger text size A
  • Largest text size A

2014 Outlook: Industrials

Unwrap some of the top themes that we believe are worth considering now.

  • By Tobias Welo, Portfolio Manager
  • – 12/18/2013
  • Industrials Sector
  • Investing in Stocks
  • Industrials Sector
  • Sectors
  • Stocks
  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.

Construction in the U.S. heats up

As of early November, many leading indicators are suggesting 2014 will be a good year for the U.S. construction industry. Purchasing managers indices (PMIs) have been very strong for the three months leading up to this report, and the positive outlook for housing and auto activity—the two most important consumer sectors for construction end markets—has been encouraging.

Housing has decelerated in recent months but has shown extremely strong growth in the past year, and we have good guidance around new communities in the works for next year. After positive years in both 2012 and 2013, housing will likely continue to improve, and associated industries may see additional growth as the level of activity increases further.

Residential housing tends to lead nonresidential construction, which is now beginning to heat up. One key leading indicator of nonresidential activity is the Architecture Billings Index, which reached a six-year high earlier in the year (see Exhibit 1, right). Like housing, nonresidential construction is a regional business, and will likely grow in some areas more quickly than in others. There is also a range of nonresidential market segments, including energy, public construction, hospitality, office, and retail, each with its own cyclical pattern.

In this phase of the overall business cycle, I look for companies with good management, a strong balance sheet, and the right combination of geographical and end-market exposure. Engineering and construction companies have tended to be big beneficiaries as nonresidential construction grows. Electrical equipment and machinery companies have also tended to increase revenues quickly as the construction cycle matures. The machinery industry is likely to benefit as energy and chemical companies build out for the current wave of domestic natural gas and shale oil production.

Planned plant capital expenditures, a leading indicator for the engineering and construction industry in particular, have risen. In one subset of the energy industry alone, the planning phase for plants to liquefy and export natural gas suggests massive potential investment, with only four LNG export applications currently approved by the government and approximately 20 still pending.1 Liquifaction plants would cost $1 billion to $2 billion for “brownfield” conversions (renovations of existing facilities) and upward of $4 billion for “greenfield” (new construction) plants.2 Engineering and construction companies may benefit greatly for several years when these huge construction projects get started. I expect the investment phase to begin ramping up in earnest in 2014.

Secular theme: energy efficiency

Another ongoing investment theme in the industrials sector has been energy efficiency. Manufacturers that make more energyefficient products may possess a real market advantage, thanks to quick economic payback combined with government regulation (current and potential) and subsidies. Fifteen years ago, many businesses had never heard of a “carbon footprint”; now, most companies publish annual sustainability reports, and have energyefficiency goals that help drive management decisions.

If a business can upgrade its lighting or air conditioning systems and get a payback in three years on energy savings, there is a strong incentive to do so. An energy-saving product will thus build market share very quickly, particularly if it has a strong lead on competitors. In addition, companies serving markets where efficiency standards are increasing may benefit even without share gains, because energy-efficient products tend to have higher margins.

Such energy-efficient products run the gamut from multimilliondollar components to everyday objects, and each has its own market dynamic. For example, not many companies will risk more than a billion dollars and many years of R&D to develop a highly efficient turbojet engine, but doing so successfully may mean huge market share gains in new aircraft platforms, with secure revenues likely lasting for a decade or more. At the other end of the spectrum, the development of inexpensive LED lighting technology will likely lead to a race to build costly manufacturing plants that can churn out millions of bulbs, because payback dynamics and sustainability goals may encourage businesses to upgrade their lighting—not a bulb at a time, but all at once, in dozens of facilities across the nation. With high barriers to entry (extensive R&D, complex plants), companies poised to own particular pieces of the energy-efficiency market stand to reap outsized share gains in the future. I think we will continue to see this theme extend through 2014.

Global economic improvement

As we approach 2014, many leading indicators for the global economy are favorable, particularly in developed economies. PMIs are up, and incremental growth in Europe and Japan in particular may boost revenues for internationally exposed industrials companies. Because inventories are already low, new incremental production growth should lead to higher revenues and earnings.

In emerging economies, the stabilization of China has been a key driver of demand for both industrial products and inputs. However, as the Chinese industrial sector evolves, we are seeing less emphasis on “one China” and more differentiation between industries and sub-industries. As a result, although the overall growth trend in China is very likely to continue improving, some companies may be better positioned than others, based on their end-market exposure.

Risks: What to watch in 2014

Continued defense budget cuts

With no end to government gridlock in immediate sight, the next round of the sequester’s mandatory cuts may very well occur. Those cuts, along with additional planned reductions in the defense budget, could create a significant challenge for the defense industry in 2014.

In 2013, many defense contractors have done an admirable job reducing costs to offset the downturn in revenues, and have used their strong cash flows and balance sheets to help maintain earnings growth. However, if revenues continue to shrink through 2014, these companies may find it difficult to increase or maintain economic earnings.

The Pentagon has warned that budget cuts may hit procurement and R&D accounts hardest, which could likely delay or eliminate many smaller programs.3 Larger, high-priority programs may find some protection, which could cushion the revenue declines for some of the established defense contractors. Smaller contractors and suppliers, however, may have fewer ways to offset the cuts. Companies with stronger balance sheets will likely weather a downturn better than others.

Valuations near average; capital return to shareholders high

Valuations in the sector are close to long-term averages, and many of the higher-returning, higher-executing businesses are now priced above the averages. As a result, few companies appear to be classic value buys at this point in the cycle, and investors may need to take a longer-term view to find inexpensive opportunities.

In general, companies have been using cash to increase shareholder return through dividends and share buybacks. With slow economic growth during this past year and light merger and acquisition (M&A) activity, shareholder-friendly capital allocation may have been the best strategy for 2013. However, as growth likely picks up, companies may need to increase capital expenditures to support customer demand. Higher growth may also lead to increased M&A activity, as sellers are more likely to realize expected value for shareholders.

Learn more

  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.
Views expressed are as of the date indicated, based on the information available at that time, and may change based on market and other conditions. Unless otherwise noted, the opinions provided are those of the author and not necessarily those of Fidelity Investments or its affiliates. Fidelity does not assume any duty to update any of the information.
Investment decisions should be based on an individual’s own goals, time horizon, and tolerance for risk.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Neither asset allocation nor diversification ensures a profit or guarantees against a loss.
Because of their narrow focus, investments in one sector tend to be more volatile than investments that diversify across many sectors and companies.
Industrials industries can be significantly affected by general economic trends, changes in consumer sentiment and spending, commodity prices, legislation, government regulation and spending, import controls, and worldwide competition, and can be subject to liability for environmental damage, depletion of resources, and mandated expenditures for safety and pollution control.
Stock markets, especially foreign markets, are volatile and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. Foreign securities are subject to interest rate, currency exchange rate, economic, and political risks, all of which are magnified in emerging markets.
A Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) is a survey of purchasing managers in a certain economic sector to determine whether there has been expansion, contraction, or no change in a sector compared to the previous month. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) reports U.S. PMIs. Markit and/or HSBC reports non-U.S. PMIs.
The Architecture Billings Index (ABI) is a diffusion index measuring monthly billings of surveyed firms. The monthly score is calculated as the percent of firms reporting a significant increase plus half the percent of firms reporting no change. Comparisons are to the previous month, and are seasonally adjusted. The ABI is calculated by the American Institute of Architects.
1. Source: U.S. Department of Energy, “Summary of LNG Export Applications,” and “Energy Department Authorizes Dominion’s Proposed Cove Point Facility to Export Liquefied Natural Gas.” http://energy.gov. Accessed Nov. 22, 2013.
2 Source: Fidelity Investments estimates, based on company filings and LNG export applications filed with the U.S. Department of Energy.
3 Source: Andrea Shalal-Esa, “Pentagon sees $20 billion hit in 2014 if budget cuts hold.” Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/05/ us-aerospace-defense-pentagon-idUSBRE98319H20130905. Accessed Oct. 27, 2013.
4. FDA.gov/U.S. Food and Drug Administration: A Special Report-Pathway to Global Product Safety and Quality.
Third-party marks are the property of their respective owners; all other marks are the property of FMR LLC.
If receiving this piece through your relationship with Fidelity Financial Advisor Solutions (FFAS), this publication is provided to investment professionals, plan sponsors, institutional investors, and individual investors by Fidelity Investments Institutional Services Company, Inc.
If receiving this piece through your relationship with Fidelity Personal & Workplace Investing (PWI), Fidelity Family Office Services (FFOS), or Fidelity Institutional Wealth Services (IWS), this publication is provided through Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Member NYSE, SIPC.
If receiving this piece through your relationship with National Financial or Fidelity Capital Markets, this publication is FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY. Clearing and custody services are provided through National Financial Services LLC, Member NYSE, SIPC.
Votes are submitted voluntarily by individuals and reflect their own opinion of the article's helpfulness. A percentage value for helpfulness will display once a sufficient number of votes have been submitted.
Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Member NYSE, SIPC, 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, RI 02917
668033.1.0