• Print
  • Default text size A
  • Larger text size A
  • Largest text size A
close

Links provided by Fidelity Brokerage Services

fidelity-fbs-iconThese links are provided by Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC ("FBS") for educational and informational purposes only. FBS is responsible for the information contained in the links. FICS and FBS are seperate but affiliated companies and FICS is not involved in the preparation or selection of these links, nor does it explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve information contained in the links.
close

Published by Fidelity Interactive Content Services

Content for this page, unless otherwise indicated with a Fidelity pyramid logo, is published or selected by Fidelity Interactive Content Services LLC ("FICS"), a Fidelity company with main offices in New York, New York. All Web pages that are published by FICS will contain this legend. FICS was established to present users with objective news, information, data and guidance on personal finance topics drawn from a diverse collection of sources including affiliated and non-affiliated financial services publications and FICS-created content. Content selected and published by FICS drawn from affiliated Fidelity companies is labeled as such. FICS selected content is not intended to provide tax, legal, insurance or investment advice and should not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security by any Fidelity entity or any third-party. Quotes are delayed unless otherwise noted. FICS is owned by FMR LLC and is an affiliate of Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC. Terms of use for Third-Party Content and Research.

Why stocks rallied in face of new Cold War

Analyzing the market's inscrutable reaction to the Crimean crisis.

  • By Mark Hulbert,
  • MarketWatch
  • – 03/18/2014
  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.

CHAPEL HILL, N.C. — What were investors thinking as they propelled the stock market higher this week in the face of heightened geopolitical tensions?

The political news over the weekend was positively scary, after all. The headlines were heralding a new cold war, and Russia's most senior government media executive began bragging that his country could turn the U.S. into "radioactive dust."

Yet how did the stock market react on Monday? By soaring: The Dow Jones Industrial Average (.DJI) gained 182 points.

And, after Russia made it official by formally annexing Crimea — a news development that came before the market opened on Tuesday morning — the Dow rose even more.

Is the stock market nuts?

No doubt.

But at least in this case its reaction is in line with how it typically behaves in the wake of geopolitical crises.

Consider a comprehensive analysis of the impact on the market of non-economic events, which despite being nearly 20 years old remains one of the standard academic works on the subject. The article, which appeared in the Journal of Portfolio Management in 1989, was written by economics professors David Cutler and Lawrence Summers, both at Harvard, and MIT's James Poterba.

The professors designed their study to find evidence that non-economic news regularly has a big impact on stocks. They focused on all entries in the "Chronology of Important World Events" from the World Almanac for the period beginning with Pearl Harbor and ending with the 1987 Crash, and then eliminated from their list any events that the New York Times did not carry as a lead story and that the Times' Business Section did not report as having affected investors.

The result was a list of 49 distinct events, such as Pearl Harbor, the Korean War, Kennedy's assassination, and so forth. The professors then measured the average absolute return of the S&P 500 index (.SPX) on these days.

Yet, far from finding that non-economic news has a big impact, they found just the opposite.

On the days that news of these 49 events hit the stock market, the S&P 500 moved just 1.46% — less than one percentage point more than the 0.56% that prevailed on all other days. Because of this small difference, the professors concluded that there is "a surprisingly small effect of non-economic news" on the stock market.

This isn't to say that the market doesn't sometimes get spooked by geopolitical crises. But on those occasions when it does suffer, it typically recovers quite quickly. According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, the stock market on average was 2.3% higher six months after the outbreak of the 28 biggest crises between 1940 and 1998.

Though the Ned Davis study was conducted before 9/11, the market's reaction to that crisis adhered to the historical pattern. Though the market did drop in that day's wake, by Oct. 26, 2001, the market was trading higher than where it closed on Sep. 10, 2001, the day before the terror attacks. That was just 45 days later.

The bottom line? Perhaps now is one of those times when the overall market knows more than we do.

  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Google Plus
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.
Copyright © 2014 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Votes are submitted voluntarily by individuals and reflect their own opinion of the article's helpfulness. A percentage value for helpfulness will display once a sufficient number of votes have been submitted.
Content for this page, unless otherwise indicated with a Fidelity pyramid logo, is published or selected by Fidelity Interactive Content Services LLC ("FICS"), a Fidelity company with main offices in New York, New York. All Web pages that are published by FICS will contain this legend. FICS was established to present users with objective news, information, data and guidance on personal finance topics drawn from a diverse collection of sources including affiliated and non-affiliated financial services publications and FICS-created content. Content selected and published by FICS drawn from affiliated Fidelity companies is labeled as such. FICS selected content is not intended to provide tax, legal, insurance or investment advice and should not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security by any Fidelity entity or any third-party. Quotes are delayed unless otherwise noted. FICS is owned by FMR LLC and is an affiliate of Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC. Terms of use for Third-Party Content and Research.
fidelity-fbs-iconThese links are provided by Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC ("FBS") for educational and informational purposes only. FBS is responsible for the information contained in the links. FICS and FBS are seperate but affiliated companies and FICS is not involved in the preparation or selection of these links, nor does it explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve information contained in the links.
Before investing, consider the funds' investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. Contact Fidelity for a prospectus or, if available, a summary prospectus containing this information.  Read it carefully.